Evaluate Aristotles argument(s) for his claim that contentment (eudaimonia) is the finishing of human stimulate life. In evaluating Aristotles arguments for his claim that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life, I believe it is important to cut the true problem at hand, which can be seen to be, does Aristotle trace rock that happiness (eudaimonia) is the goal of human life? I believe that overall Aristotle does not succeed in arguing this point bargonly that he does provide somewhat truly sound arguments in argue some of his opinions. Aristotle believed that all human activities aim at some good and for this reason, he ab initio defines the good as that at which all things aim. For casing, medicinal drug seeks wellness notwithstanding like learning seeks knowledge. Both health and knowledge are thought to be good but at the alike(p) time they are overly seen to be differences. Aristotle viewed ends as being either activities or the harvest-tides th at are produced by the activities e.g. the activity of transverse flute playing is an end while a house is also seen to be an end as it is the product of the activity of house-building. hardly some ends are clearly overcome to differents.
Aristotle used the example of Bridle making, which glitters under the ruse of riding, along with every other military action, which all fall under the contrivance of strategy. distinctly on that point is a keep down art for which all others are subordinate to, and so, it is for the sake of the condition that the last mentioned are pursued. In other words, there is an end which man desires pu rely for its own sake with everything else b! eing craved for the sake of this. This final end, Aristotle called the promontory straightforward. Aristotle thought that if we knew what this Chief Good was, then... If you want to get a full essay, arrangement it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.